EP 378 The IRS Just Sent High Earners a Warning

APPLE PODCASTS | SPOTIFY

Sometimes the biggest financial changes don’t arrive with breaking news alerts.

They don’t dominate headlines.

They don’t become the topic everyone is talking about at dinner.

Instead, they quietly appear inside hundreds of pages of legislation, affecting millions of people before most even realize the rules have changed.

That’s exactly what happened this year.

If you’re over 50 and earn more than $150,000 a year, one of the ways you’ve been saving for retirement just changed.

At first glance, it looks like a tax increase.

But after digging into the rule, Nancy and I came away with a very different conclusion.

We don’t think it’s really about taxes.

We think it’s a signal.

And once we saw that signal, we couldn’t stop seeing it everywhere.

Sometimes Your Body Teaches You More Than Your Accountant

A few years ago, we traveled to Scandinavia to chase the Northern Lights.

It was one of those trips we’d dreamed about for years.

Snow-covered forests.

Dog sleds.

Tiny villages.

Everything looked magical.

It was also the coldest either of us has ever been.

We had purchased the best winter gear we could find.

The highest-rated boots.

Multiple layers.

All the equipment we were told we needed.

It didn’t matter.

Within minutes, our feet were completely numb.

Eventually, we climbed into a heated van, and it took nearly an hour before we finally felt warm again.

Later, we learned something fascinating.

Our feet weren’t failing.

Our bodies had simply made a decision.

When temperatures became dangerous, our bodies redirected warm blood away from our hands and feet and toward the organs that mattered most.

Our bodies weren’t trying to keep everything equally warm.

They were protecting what they valued most.

That changed how we started thinking about tax policy.

Every Tax Code Reveals Priorities

Governments, just like our bodies, make decisions about where resources flow.

When they change the rules around one type of income but leave another largely untouched, they’re communicating something.

Not necessarily with words.

But through incentives.

That’s why this year’s retirement contribution rule caught our attention.

For years, higher-income workers over age 50 could choose whether their catch-up contributions went into a traditional pre-tax account or a Roth account.

Now, for many of those earners, that choice has disappeared.

The contribution must go into a Roth account.

Which means paying taxes today instead of receiving the deduction upfront.

Most headlines stopped there.

We didn’t.

Because we weren’t asking whether the rule was good or bad.

We were asking a different question:

Why this type of income?

The Story Isn’t The $8,000

Most conversations focus on the amount.

The additional catch-up contribution.

The tax deduction.

The retirement account.

We think that’s the smallest part of the story.

The more interesting question is why the rule only applies to one category of income.

Earned income.

The income reported on a W-2.

That’s what the legislation looks at.

Not your net worth.

Not your investments.

Not your balance sheet.

One specific kind of income.

And once we realized that, another story came to mind.

Two Travelers. Same Wealth. Completely Different Outcome.

For years, we traveled internationally almost nonstop while running our fashion business.

Coming back through U.S. Customs always fascinated us.

You’d see travelers standing side by side.

Some walked straight through.

Others were pulled aside for additional screening.

Eventually, we learned something important.

The system wasn’t judging how much someone carried.

It was evaluating how it was documented.

A professional diamond trader can legally cross a border carrying extraordinary value.

Why?

Because every diamond has documentation.

Invoices.

Ownership records.

Business structure.

Now compare that to someone carrying undeclared cash.

The value might be identical.

The treatment isn’t.

The paperwork changes everything.

And that’s exactly what we saw inside this new retirement rule.

The government isn’t treating every dollar differently.

It’s treating different types of income differently.

Maybe The Better Question Isn’t “How Much?”

For years, many of us have focused on earning more.

Higher salaries.

Larger bonuses.

Bigger businesses.

Those goals matter.

But this rule quietly asks another question:

How are you earning it?

Because taxes don’t simply respond to how much money you make.

They respond to what kind of income arrives.

That’s a very different conversation.

The Freshwater Eel Changed How We Think About Wealth

One of our favorite examples in nature is the freshwater eel.

It begins life in the ocean.

Later, it swims into freshwater rivers.

To survive, it literally changes its biology.

Its body adapts to an entirely different environment.

Years later, it returns to the ocean again.

It isn’t trapped in one environment.

It adapts.

That feels like one of the most powerful lessons in wealth building.

Most people believe they’re permanently tied to one type of income.

A paycheck.

A salary.

A bonus.

But that’s simply where many of us begin.

It doesn’t have to be where we stay.

Over time, earned income can become owned income.

Assets can begin producing cash flow.

Businesses can create income independent of our daily effort.

Ownership gradually replaces labor.

That’s not about avoiding taxes.

It’s about building a financial structure that depends less on selling our time.

What This Rule Really Made Us Ask

This new retirement rule didn’t make us angry.

It made us curious.

Because every incentive inside a tax code points somewhere.

Instead of asking how to preserve one deduction, we started asking a bigger question:

What kind of financial life are we actually building?

One dependent on a paycheck?

Or one increasingly supported by ownership?

That question matters far longer than this year’s legislation.

Because tax laws will continue changing.

Governments will continue adjusting incentives.

But ownership has remained one of the most consistent paths to long-term wealth across generations.

Maybe that’s the real lesson hiding inside this rule.

Not that the government changed the tax code.

But that it quietly reminded us to think differently about where our income comes from in the first place.